Creating a climate fund was hard. Naming it is, too.

By Sara Schonhardt | 05/02/2024 06:33 AM EDT

Nothing comes easy with loss and damage. Attempts to find agreement over what to call it has caused problems.

Flood survivors use a makeshift barge to carry hay for cattle in Jaffarabad, Pakistan.

Flood survivors use a makeshift barge to carry hay for cattle in Jaffarabad, Pakistan. Fareed Khan/AP

The board members of a new fund that will help countries recover from climate change disasters had a lot to cover in their first meeting this week. But there was one thing they weren’t ready to tackle: what to call it.

Getting more than 190 countries to approve the fund, known in diplomatic circles as loss and damage, was a crowning achievement of last year’s COP28 climate talks in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. It came together after a year of often tense negotiations about how it should operate and who should receive its money. The first inkling of the fund goes back much further — to 1991.

Compared with that, deciding on a name might seem easy.

Advertisement

Or not.

GET FULL ACCESS